Politics

Trump suggests Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles and San Diego if it develops nuclear weapons

donald-trump-1-gty-gmh-261006_1791290949490_hpMain_16x9
Foto : Patricia Smith - tyunews.com
Daftar Isi
  1. Trump Suggests Iran Could Take Out California Cities
  2. FAQ for Los Angeles and San Diego Residents
  3. Related Reading

Trump Suggests Iran Could Take Out California Cities

Tyunews.com – Trump suggests Iran could take out Los Angeles and San Diego if Iran develops nuclear weapons, a remark that prompted strong criticism from California officials and political figures. President Donald Trump made the comments during a political rally in Nebraska, where he argued that confronting Iran was necessary for U.S. security.

Addressing supporters, Trump said the financial cost of the conflict was worth paying to prevent a larger threat to the United States and its allies. He framed the situation as an effort to stop Iran from becoming capable of carrying out catastrophic attacks.

“Let them take out Los Angeles, let them take out San Diego.”

The crowd cheered after the statement. Critics said naming major American cities in that context was reckless, while supporters of a tougher Iran policy pointed to Trump’s broader argument about deterrence and national defense.

California officials condemn Trump’s remarks

Gov. Gavin Newsom called the comments “deranged and dangerous.” Later Monday, Newsom described Trump’s language as “disgusting and disqualifying,” renewing his criticism of the president’s approach to the conflict.

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass also condemned the remarks, saying they were dangerous and could undermine public safety. The response reflected concern over language that portrayed heavily populated U.S. communities as potential targets or collateral damage.

Los Angeles is the nation’s second-largest city by population. San Diego has major military significance as the home of Naval Base San Diego, the principal homeport of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, as well as other important defense facilities.

Jim Desmond, a Republican, Navy veteran and candidate for an open congressional seat covering parts of San Diego County, also rejected the comments.

“I vehemently disagree with President Trump’s comments. America must stand up to Iran and defend our interests, but the first responsibility of our Commander in Chief is to protect the American people and our homeland.”

“No American city is expendable, and no American family should ever be treated as collateral damage.”

Security concerns involving Iran remain under review

Trump’s remarks followed reports of two recently foiled plots: an attempted attack involving an Israel-bound passenger flight in the Middle East and a possible attack on a U.K. airbase used by the U.S. Air Force.

Before the Nebraska rally, Trump said an Iran-linked threat against the British base had led the United States to relocate its bombers. Investigations into both incidents were continuing, and public details directly linking Tehran to either case remained limited.

U.K. Prime Minister Andy Burnham said there were “strong indications” of Iranian involvement in the alleged plot targeting the airbase. Trump said he believed Iran was responsible for the attempted hijacking of the passenger flight, though neither leader publicly offered further evidence for those conclusions.

Trump suggests Iran could take such action only if it gains a nuclear weapon, presenting that possibility as the central reason for his policy position. The allegations have added to concerns that attacks involving military facilities, aviation infrastructure or civilian travel could widen the conflict.

Trump argues conflict is necessary for deterrence

At the rally, Trump returned to his view that confronting Iran now could prevent a more dangerous crisis later. He said the conflict was close to ending, although he acknowledged it could continue longer than expected.

“And they might keep going a little long. You know, they always say they have a big threshold for pain. They need it, let me tell you they need it. But it’s going to end very soon, and it’ll end one way or the other.”

By arguing that the costs of the conflict were a limited price for long-term safety, Trump focused on deterrence and the consequences of a nuclear-capable Iran. Opponents instead emphasized the impact of his comments on residents of Los Angeles and San Diego.

For Californians, the controversy turned an international-security debate into a local concern about public safety, military readiness and presidential leadership during a crisis. Trump suggests Iran could take out the cities as a warning about nuclear proliferation, but critics said no American community should be described as expendable.

FAQ for Los Angeles and San Diego Residents

Did officials report a specific threat to Los Angeles or San Diego?

The remarks described a hypothetical danger if Iran obtained nuclear weapons. The reported investigations discussed possible threats elsewhere, including the Middle East and the United Kingdom, rather than a publicly identified, specific threat to Los Angeles or San Diego.

Why is San Diego central to this discussion?

San Diego is home to Naval Base San Diego, the principal homeport of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, along with other defense facilities. Its military role makes it especially relevant when national-security concerns are discussed.

What was the main criticism of Trump’s statement?

Critics objected to Trump’s description of Los Angeles and San Diego as possible targets, arguing that a president’s first responsibility is to protect American communities and avoid treating any city or family as collateral damage.

Leave a Comment